Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Jun 2007 20:40 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Privacy, Security, Encryption "I was somewhat surprised (but pleased) at the level of interest back when I published my Windows Vista - 90 Day Vulnerability Report. It was about the earliest span of time I thought might give us some indicators, and the indicators did look good. Six months is a much more interesting time frame, and gives us the opportunity to see if the early trend indicators are holding up, or if the early signs of progress were a short-term gain."
Thread beginning with comment 250478
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Insufficient data
by AdamW on Mon 25th Jun 2007 21:41 UTC in reply to "RE: Insufficient data"
AdamW
Member since:
2005-07-06

As I said, I read the PDF, the info I mention is not there.

I'm not saying I suspect the report is intentionally misleading or in bad faith, I don't believe that. I'd just like to take a look at what the patched and unpatched issues for each product are and see if the overall report is an accurate reflection of the actual security profile in each case.

Edited 2007-06-25 21:41

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: Insufficient data
by jayson.knight on Mon 25th Jun 2007 21:52 in reply to "RE[2]: Insufficient data"
jayson.knight Member since:
2005-07-06

I wasn't calling you out specifically hence why I said "for those who haven't read it yet." I know a lot of readers around here A) have a tendency not to open up PDF's and B) have a tendency to comment on articles without first reading them in their entirety.

:-)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[4]: Insufficient data
by AdamW on Mon 25th Jun 2007 22:07 in reply to "RE[3]: Insufficient data"
AdamW Member since:
2005-07-06

no argument there ;) I agree entirely.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1