Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Jun 2007 20:40 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 250556
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-02
It could be just that Ubuntu doesn't get good security testing directly in their distro so they put out fewer patches? All of his numbers are based on what he sees in the patch data...
I will tell you that I can believe Windows has few security issues. Microsoft hired a huge number of penetration testers in addition to having a large and onerous security process in developing their software. Vista is the first consumer OS released that was developed under the security regime, so it is expected to be a significant leap over XP. Read Michael Howard's blog sometime...