Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Jun 2007 20:40 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Privacy, Security, Encryption "I was somewhat surprised (but pleased) at the level of interest back when I published my Windows Vista - 90 Day Vulnerability Report. It was about the earliest span of time I thought might give us some indicators, and the indicators did look good. Six months is a much more interesting time frame, and gives us the opportunity to see if the early trend indicators are holding up, or if the early signs of progress were a short-term gain."
Thread beginning with comment 250556
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Meaningless "Report"
by PlatformAgnostic on Tue 26th Jun 2007 03:27 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Meaningless "Report""
PlatformAgnostic
Member since:
2006-01-02

It could be just that Ubuntu doesn't get good security testing directly in their distro so they put out fewer patches? All of his numbers are based on what he sees in the patch data...

I will tell you that I can believe Windows has few security issues. Microsoft hired a huge number of penetration testers in addition to having a large and onerous security process in developing their software. Vista is the first consumer OS released that was developed under the security regime, so it is expected to be a significant leap over XP. Read Michael Howard's blog sometime...

Reply Parent Score: 3