Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Jun 2007 20:36 UTC, submitted by Techie
Linux "Let's face it; some distributions have better controls for handling display issues than others. Two that do it right out of the box that come to mind include Fedora (Red Hat) and openSUSE (Novell). Each includes tools that minimize the need to do what I gleefully refer to as the 'Xorg dance'. Basically, these options mean you are going to be spending more time exploring what these distros have to offer, yet less time wondering why your resolution looks completely off. Unfortunately, even with the latest release of Ubuntu, we have yet to see this level of functionality."
Thread beginning with comment 250644
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Same ****
by gustl on Tue 26th Jun 2007 12:45 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Same ****"
gustl
Member since:
2006-01-19

As your parent said:

It is a strong point of X's ARCHITECTURE, and an extremely weak one in the CONFIGURATION.

I believe X's architecture lets you do pretty everything you want, be it locally or remote, but either Xorg.conf does not provide a way to make X do what you want, or it is so mind boggingly complex, that it is undoable for everyone but a die-hard Xorg programmer.

I hope, the Xorg guys will fix that in the near future

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[4]: Same ****
by Redeeman on Tue 26th Jun 2007 14:24 in reply to "RE[3]: Same ****"
Redeeman Member since:
2006-03-23

Sweet! i didnt know i was a diehard hardcore ultra leet X programmer, i guess i have some hidden talents.

1: easily configure X (while not being afraid of a simple config file)
2: ?
3: profit from newfound programming abilities!

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2