Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Jun 2007 18:47 UTC, submitted by Datatec
Thread beginning with comment 251431
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Re: Mono would be nice too
by mmu_man on Fri 29th Jun 2007 01:19
in reply to "Re: Mono would be nice too"
RE[2]: Re: Mono would be nice too
by umccullough on Fri 29th Jun 2007 02:03
in reply to "RE: Re: Mono would be nice too"
I have to assume you're referring to Portable.NET?
http://bebits.com/app/4072
It's not really meant to compete with Mono anyway...
RE: Re: Mono would be nice too
by bryanv on Fri 29th Jun 2007 03:53
in reply to "Re: Mono would be nice too"
RE[2]: Re: Mono would be nice too
by anevilyak on Fri 29th Jun 2007 04:25
in reply to "RE: Re: Mono would be nice too"





Member since:
2007-06-28
Boy, I don't envy anyone attempting that Java port. What a bear. That could take another 3 years if it's just a few people working on it in their spare time.
Not too many have been talking about a Mono port, but that would also open the door to some nice development environments (SharpDevelop and MonoDevelop) and many other programming languages for Haiku. I haven't read about a freely available Java compiler that is up-to-date with generics, etc. but at least IKVM could be used to get the Java bytecode running under Mono's CLR.