Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Jun 2007 21:39 UTC, submitted by jayson.knight

Thread beginning with comment 251441
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
And yet, Microsoft keeps extending XP's support. Not only does this increase the amount of work they have to do (what is that, 3 primary OSs now, two home and one server?), it's going to give them headaches down the road when Vista+1 comes out and tight-fisted bosses are still hanging back on Vista for as long as humanly possible...
This isn't a support extension. It's just making it easier for customers to exercise the downgrade rights they already have.
Member since:
2007-02-22
Part of the reason that XP was being moved to 'end of life' was an attempt to bring some sort of predictability to the support lifecycle system. 5 years primary support, 5 years extended support, with only limited extensibility of these dates. The idea was to get consumers to know exactly when a product would no longer be supported, so they could plan ahead instead of being surprsied.
And yet, Microsoft keeps extending XP's support. Not only does this increase the amount of work they have to do (what is that, 3 primary OSs now, two home and one server?), it's going to give them headaches down the road when Vista+1 comes out and tight-fisted bosses are still hanging back on Vista for as long as humanly possible...
Edited 2007-06-28 23:14