To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Never a new MacOSX caused any appreciable trouble"
You're not going to hear about OSX rollouts because they don't exist in the business world, which is where all large scale rollouts take place. Businesses usually have a homogeneous set of hardware deployed, so if Vista doesn't work on one machine, it's a good bet it won't work on most of them, and thus those kinds of stories make headlines.
This isn't about consumers, this is targeting large scale licensees.
The OSX updates 10.4 10.5 are the same as windows moving from Win2k (5.0) WinXP (5.1).
The mac does have service packs like windows 10.4.1 10.4.2 etc.. (SP1, SP2).
The main difference i have seen is that with every release on the Mac it gets quicker, where as every release after Win2k seems to get slower. Personally i think Win2k was the last great Client OS from Microsoft.
OSX is moving more and more as a viable platform simply because a lot of companies are now implementing their business logic and software on web platforms, accessible by any computer. It's as if the IT world has come full circle with the mainframes to client server and now back to mainframe type working (i.e. central computer (farm) provides the UI, processing and data storage.
Windows will never go away overnight and probably never will as although it has it's problems it works mostly well.
Microsoft is a strange company, if there's no competition they give up and release stale useless products. Give them competition and they work damn hard and provide some good stuff. I love Windows 2003 server i think it's a solid product, i don't really like Vista as there are far too many problems with it (network stalling, high memory usage) however because Mac OSX and Linux are now serious compeition i expect the release after Vista R2 to be very good.




Member since:
2006-07-18
On the contrary. Let those people upgrade to THE better OS.