To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Oh really? that old xp applications are unsupported and u cant even install xp/2000 drivers on it not vistas fault? "
No, it's not Vista's fault. It's the developers' faults. MS has produced reams of information on how to make your apps/drivers/kitchen sink compatible with Vista, and betas have been around for 3+ years now. For every 1 application which isn't compatible, there are 10 which are that you never hear about b/c no one cares about hearing the good side of things.
If a company refuses to write a Vista driver for their older hardware, how is that Vista's fault? MS was very clear from the beginning...there will be some incompatibilities. People can either cry about it, or do one of two things: Stick with XP if they need their older hardware/software, or pony up and purchase compatible versions. If XP is 'good enough' by all means stick with it.





Member since:
2006-12-30
Oh really? that old xp applications are unsupported and u cant even install xp/2000 drivers on it not vistas fault?
Vista aint a move like win2000/XP back then they moved from windows 98 to windows 2000 meaning win9x to Nt in other words people got sick of having the windows interface as a Gui for dos and needed something new.
The way people bloat programs today affects ram and cpu usage alot , multitasking becomes sluggish even on xp.
If bloatware is supposed to run on pc's i suggest pc's get better timing for that, why buy a new pc that is faster cpu-wise but behaves slower than winxp on 486dx2?
I just boycott vista , no need for it (hopefully ever)