Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 29th Jun 2007 23:09 UTC, submitted by thebluesgnr
Thread beginning with comment 251785
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: GPL is about software freedom, not free software
by npang on Sat 30th Jun 2007 13:08
in reply to "RE: GPL is about software freedom, not free software"
GPL3 is written in *exactly* the same spirit as GPL2. The essence of all GNU GPLs are:
* The concept of conveying the four freedoms of free software to all licensees
* The concept of ensuring that the licensees of GPLed software will not "subjugate" other users i.e., the GPL has language that prevents licensees from distributing the GPLed software as proprietary software.
The major changes in GPL3 are:
* Tighter wording of the language of GPL2 to facilitate international enforcement of the licence.
* Explicit declaration of terms that were present but only implied in GPL2





Member since:
2006-10-08
A very good and still simple comparison, thank you. Just to put it into a formal setting:
BSD -> use for free, as long as BSDL code copyright is retained
GPLv2 -> use and contribute back
GPLv3 -> use, contribute back and don't use patents / DRM
Commercial -> use and pay money
The GPLv3 extends the requirements of the v2, while the BSDL has lower requirements than GPLv2 and v3.
=> BryanFeeney.mod++;