Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 29th Jun 2007 23:09 UTC, submitted by thebluesgnr
Thread beginning with comment 251994
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-12-02
"Which is flat out wrong. First, they only waive rights on the specific patents exercised in the GPLv3 works they distribute. They don't become public property. Rather, sub-licenses are granted to recipients of derivative works."
I do believe you are correct after re-reading it through. Apparently I missed a couple words when I read through it the first time.