Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 1st Jul 2007 10:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 252087
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Even if they had linked against GPL code, they would not be forced to reveal their code. If they chose not to disclose their code, then they would lose the right to distribute the GPL code.
This would mean they would have to retire their product and rework it to add in the lost GPL functionality. As for the improper distribution already done, a court would have to define what compensations were due.
But in no case would they be forced by court to reveal their code.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Why would it have been "great" if it was GPL'd?
Most likely if it had been GPL'd it would never have been used in the first place, and they would have re-implemented the code from scratch and made it closed source. And that way everybody would be worse off.