Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th Jul 2007 09:11 UTC, submitted by Tim Alson
Thread beginning with comment 253194
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-10
"... so the solution to this is to begin a new OS development based on one of the Unixes available out there ..."
Well, yes and no. It's just that no one is paying attention.
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/plan9/
"(Speaking of Mac OS X, I would've preferred that Apple's Copeland project succeeded, so that their OS wouldn't be yet another Unix, and there'd be a third type of OS commonly in use (besides Unix-based and NT-based).)"
I totally agree. But reality was knocking. It was ahead of it's time.
http://lowendmac.com/orchard/05/1108.html
http://www.igeek.com/articles/History/CoplandAndNeXT.txt
A/UX
http://www.aux-penelope.com/index.htm
hylas