Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 6th Jul 2007 11:05 UTC, submitted by WillM
Thread beginning with comment 253568
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-04-21
Your statements are so wrong it's almost as if you were purposely trying to spread the FUD. Microsoft embraced open source long before they opened their labs...and only for what they can get out of it. They have released source code of stuff like FoxPro which they don't want to support anymore. They have an open source lab at their headquarters where pay lip service to open source. They "opened" their labs to the open source community but the community saw through their tactics. And now for some odd reason you think they should be believed. Don't try to come here and tell us that Microsoft are the canine's testicles when they have done everything possible to screw the open source community (or have you forgotten their patent (pun intended) linux-violates-patents-and-we're-not-going-to-tell-you-
what-they-are-even-although-patents-are-by-definition-
publicly-available bullshit already?) Perhaps it's Microsoft that needs to change and not open source.