Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 6th Jul 2007 11:02 UTC, submitted by alcibiades
Thread beginning with comment 253613
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2007-06-27
0.16.7.2 - 2004-12-13 23:36
0.16.8 - 2006-02-08 12:06
Actually, it was only a little over a year and two months (according to the releases on SF.net), not quite three years. Even in the meantime, there *was* work to move from 16.7 to 16.8, so I wouldn't say that "development stopped".
I won't bother arguing with the rest, since I suppose it's a matter of personal preference whether you prefer buggy software (and baked-in hacks to ship before a release is truly ready) or a long development cycle. The long development cycle has certainly worked for Code::Blocks - some people I've encountered swear by it, despite the fact that only nightly builds have been available since the plans to make RC3 were scrapped.
Edited 2007-07-07 02:47