Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 7th Jul 2007 19:19 UTC, submitted by flanque
Mobile-gadget makers are starting to take advantage of software-defined radio, a new technology allowing a single device to receive signals from multiple sources, including TV stations and cell phone networks. But a new federal rule set to take effect Friday could mean that radios built on 'open-source elements' may encounter a more sluggish path to market - or, in the worst case scenario, be shut out altogether. U.S. regulators, it seems, believe the inherently public nature of open-source code makes it more vulnerable to hackers, leaving 'a high burden to demonstrate that it is sufficiently secure'.
Thread beginning with comment 253736
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: move development outside the USA
by kad77 on Sun 8th Jul 2007 18:20
in reply to "move development outside the USA"
Member since:2007-03-20
RE: move development outside the USA
by yakirz on Sun 8th Jul 2007 20:07
in reply to "move development outside the USA"
Member since:2006-05-11
RE: move development outside the USA
by samad on Mon 9th Jul 2007 05:27
in reply to "move development outside the USA"
Member since:2006-03-31
RE[2]: move development outside the USA
by Budd on Mon 9th Jul 2007 09:04
in reply to "RE: move development outside the USA"
Member since:2005-07-08
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-01-07
Fine. If the USA wants to ban open source technology, the developers should move all their work outside the USA. I can envision a scenario 10 years from now where the USA becomes a Third World backwater, buried by a debt it can't pay, using outmoded technology, while companies in Russia, China and India prove to be the real innovators.
As for why this is happening - well, what do you expect from the Bush administration? They no doubt see open source developers as terrorists.