Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Jul 2007 18:23 UTC, submitted by estherschindler
Thread beginning with comment 254470
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
While in XP you were hard pushed to know that your reports were makin any difference, the same can not be said with Vista.
The Problem Reports and Solutions centre in Vista is excellent.
You get updates with issues you have found, it even links you to updated drivers of websites to get patches for failed products with reasons for the failure.
As to this article; it honestly seems like a non-entity to me. Why should Microsoft tell anyone anything about this process? They say it won't be used to personally identify, it won't be sold on.
You either believe them and send the error reports, or you don't believe them (or for other reasons) and don't.
An online person(ality?) getting their nose out of joint significantly enough to post on the CIO website that Microsoft didn't answer his question really induces a big case of "and?" for me I'm afraid.