Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Thu 19th Jul 2007 06:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 256429
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Umm, yes I thought that too after writing the first comment, you are right. IMHO if you've written that more explicitly in your review, I could realise that earlier and just say. "Oh, yes! good point" and write nothing an move on".
You are far more experienced than me in writing articles (I'm writing a blog about my personal experiences about programming and computers in a blog) but I'll say that anyway. Sometimes implicitly written intentions cannot be understood and some unnecessary noise can be raised by readers (like me. I just missed the point of the article).






Member since:
2005-06-28
Actually, it's not unfair at all. You see, the article simply shows what happens when you upgrade an older PC. You see, it is NOT clear that if you upgrade a graphics card you will get so much better rendering times and video playback. Sure, you will get better 3D performance, but multimedia is NOT clear to everyone out there that it will be faster. And this is why I wrote the review: because I wanted to show to fellow videographers or even casual HD enthusiasts who don't use NLEs or apps that support GL, that they can clearly benefit from a newer card. I am pretty sure that a newer ATI card will perform equally well in the multimedia front: it's just that I have no way of testing it.
Hence, I find my article pretty clear as to what it was trying to achieve: a WAKE UP CALL to fellow media users. I know video semi-professionals who use an Intel card with their Adobe Premiere!!! I really hope that this article wakes them up because there is significant speeds up to be gained from a gaming card, even if your media app doesn't support Quadro GL or whatever other similar PRO card!
I am not sure how more clear this can be written as.
Edited 2007-07-19 10:47