Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Jul 2007 12:54 UTC
Windows Six months ago, after a long gestation period, Microsoft finally released Windows Vista. Vista is a huge release; not only because of the long list of new features, but also because of its sheer size, and number of bugs and other oddities and downsides. The development process that lead to Vista has left many with a very bitter aftertaste; features were cut, codebases were scrapped, release dates postponed. A few days ago, Microsoft released some sparse details on Vista's successor, internally dubbed 'Windows 7', and in order to prevent another Vista-like development cycle, here is what I would advise Microsoft to do. Update: APCMag reports that Julie Larson-Green, who was the driving force behind Office 2007's new Ribbon user interface, has been transferred to the Windows 7 GUI team.
Thread beginning with comment 257463
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Soulbender
Member since:
2005-08-18

"its a vaporware relase through and through."

Uh no, it may be a dissapointment but it is not vaporware. Vaporware is overhyped software that has not yet been released.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

twickline Member since:
2005-12-31

Vista = unwarranted optimism
Vista = deception
Vista = complete failure on completion date, feature set, feasibility.

In my opinion it's Vaporware even tho it was released, what other choice did they have? to wait another five years to really, really fix it?

Edited 2007-07-23 14:20

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

complete failure on completion date

The only official release date EVER set by Microsoft was the one they indeed did ship it on. The other dates were NOT official; based on rumours, or individual employees making remarks on it.

feature set

Apart from WinFS and Monad, there's little I can think of that was scrapped.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

flanque Member since:
2005-12-15

Um yes, but it was released.. so... it's not.. vaporware.

Plenty of other software has been released with reduced functionality and it's not tagged as "vaporware".

You're very much free to be disappointed with Vista, but tagging it as vaporware is entirely wrong, no matter how you spin it.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

"In my opinion it's Vaporware even tho it was released"

Your opinion doesn't really matter. Vista does not fit the definition of vaporware. End of story.

Edited 2007-07-24 02:58

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3