Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Jul 2007 12:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 257560
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: The bitter aftertaste of Vista
by google_ninja on Mon 23rd Jul 2007 21:10
in reply to "RE[9]: The bitter aftertaste of Vista"
stuff like id3 only came about because of the lack of the feature on the filesystem.
When you take the feature to the file system, then you can start to drastically change the way file managers work, and thats the prime advantage.
As for vendor lock-in, this is always a problem, and it will take a huge amount of work to get something this complex to work from another platform. however, we are already more or less in this position, linux filesystems store different data then hfs+, which stores different data then ntfs.




Member since:
2005-07-06
I stated there was a place for meta data in media files in my post, but not everything needs meta data and adding it to a file system seems backwards. It would be better to have Media files with a wrapper or add-on like an ID3 tag on mp3s. If the meta data was stored in an addendum to the media files themselves then the files could be moved from file-system to file-system while preserving the information.
By making the meta-data file-system specific wouldn't that create that dreaded "Microsoft Lock-in" that everyone always bitches about? Then we'd have all kinds of wasted effort and time spent trying to convert this data so that other file-systems could use it and not restrict the files to a Microsoft only file system.
No thanks.