Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Jul 2007 21:04 UTC, submitted by troy.unrau
Internet & Networking "There is one major web rendering engine that grew entirely out of the open source world: KHTML is KDE's web renderer which was built from the ground up by the open source community with very little original corporate backing. The code was good and branches were born as a result, the best known being Webkit. Now, after years of split, KHTML and Webkit are coming together once again."
Thread beginning with comment 257592
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Great great great news
by Vide on Mon 23rd Jul 2007 22:02 UTC
Vide
Member since:
2006-02-17

This will bring REAL competition to Gecko, and everyone will benefit from this! ;)

RE: Great great great news
by JrezIN on Mon 23rd Jul 2007 22:21 in reply to "Great great great news"
JrezIN Member since:
2005-06-29

Well... yes, but WebKit is actually better a contender to Opera's Rendering Technology.

But yes, Everyone will benefit from this (specially mobile devices' users! =] )

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[2]: Great great great news
by miscz on Tue 24th Jul 2007 10:49 in reply to "RE: Great great great news"
miscz Member since:
2005-07-17

But yes, Everyone will benefit from this (specially mobile devices' users! =] )

We already do ;) Nokia's browser is using Webkit... and Apple iPhone, obviously.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE: Great great great news
by wirespot on Mon 23rd Jul 2007 23:40 in reply to "Great great great news"
wirespot Member since:
2006-06-21

I see this used a lot, but I'm not sure that "competition" is the right term when it comes to something developed by free software communities. Wouldn't "alternative" be better? I mean, what are they competing for?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[2]: Great great great news
by umccullough on Tue 24th Jul 2007 00:21 in reply to "RE: Great great great news"
umccullough Member since:
2006-01-26

I see this used a lot, but I'm not sure that "competition" is the right term when it comes to something developed by free software communities. Wouldn't "alternative" be better? I mean, what are they competing for?

Marketshare.

Just because it's FOSS doesn't mean there's no competition! When you sit down to play games with friends, don't you intend to win? What would be the point of building an alternative if it wasn't intended to compete with an existing solution in some way.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3