Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Jul 2007 15:11 UTC, submitted by flanque
Thread beginning with comment 257943
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That's because web stats are never a good indicator of market share. There are many reasons why Linux usage would be misreported (user agents, sample bias, over-representation of certain Windows clients, over-representation of narrow-band users with dynamic IPs, etc.).
This subject has been endlessly debated here in the past, btw.






Member since:
2005-12-15
It's all on the site.
Here's the Linux share over the last 12 months:
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=5&qpcustom=Linux
Here's the XP share over the last 12 months:
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=5&qpcustom=Window...
There's no listing for Amiga, but there is "Unknown":
http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=5&qpcustom=Unknow...
IF these stats are to be believed, then Linux isn't in the top 5 and it's growth is pretty much stagnant.
Something about these stats regarding Linux strike me as a bit odd. I would have thought it would have been higher.