Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Jul 2007 13:48 UTC, submitted by Moochman
Thread beginning with comment 258196
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Ohhh, another M:N threading model. When are they going to learn that userspace thread scheduling just doesn't perform very well? Why can't they just split the process into threads and let the kernel schedule them?
How so? M:N threading is complex to implement, but when done right, it can out perform the competition. Take Tru64 for instance, which uses M:N threading.
Its one of those things in the IT world, great on paper, a real bitch to implement in real life, but when done well, does perform well.






Member since:
2005-07-08
Their marketing material almost implies that the library itself goes through the trouble of implementing yet another scheduler in addition to the one the OS already has.
Ohhh, another M:N threading model. When are they going to learn that userspace thread scheduling just doesn't perform very well? Why can't they just split the process into threads and let the kernel schedule them?