Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 31st Aug 2005 09:14 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 25893
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: re:CPUGuy on 2005-08-31 in reply to "re:
by on Wed 31st Aug 2005 14:34
in reply to "RE: re:CPUGuy on 2005-08-31 in reply to "re:"
RE[3]: re:CPUGuy on 2005-08-31 in reply to "re:
by CPUGuy on Wed 31st Aug 2005 20:43
in reply to "RE[2]: re:CPUGuy on 2005-08-31 in reply to "re:"




Member since:
2005-07-07
If the server w2k3 is so stable and good why didn't they use it instead of moving to BSD dns-servers?
Ummm, maybe because like CPUGuy said, the DNS servers weren't Microsoft's and were therefore out of Microsoft's control...
That's like saying General Motors makes crappy vehicles because some of their suppliers deliver their parts to them using vehicles made by someone else.