Linked by David Adams on Wed 1st Aug 2007 06:24 UTC, submitted by Tyr.
Thread beginning with comment 259836
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
> I don't know but perhaps you have to pay for each architecture and as the futur of Mac OS X is Intel, they do not want to pay twice.
peanuts - take a look at the rather low fees: http://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/Brandfees.htm
only $ 110.000 per year (if apple manages to sell more than 30.000 servers). but as they pay according to units sold, and don't sell any ppc-servers anymore, they probably can't license ppc-osx. of course, as all units of osx-server are universal, they could also pay the fee twice. but i imagine steve would feel ripped of.






Member since:
2005-06-29
I wonder why the certification was issued only for the Intel version of Leopard. Aren't they generally the same (at least, standards-wise)?
http://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/apple.htm