Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 5th Aug 2007 11:33 UTC, submitted by Meng
Thread beginning with comment 261163
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Illegal why?
Illegal in the sense you are restricted to use in a given machine? Where's that contract one signs saying it? Right, there's none..."
Illegal in the sense you are restricted to use in a given machine? Where's that contract one signs saying it? Right, there's none..."
Copywrite violation == illegal.
This is such a basic fact it really shouldn't need to be explained on a forum such as this
Copyright violation as where one uses what one had payed for?
It's digital, I do have the right to backup. MY Original vanilla 1200 got broken, though sh*t, well perhaps not because I can just use the backup rom and revive it in another shell.
I know, it would probably be a lot cooler for the corporation just having me buying another computer from them, but hey Commodore just went bust, news flash! There's no news A1200s...
Copywrite violation == illegal.
Which Copywrite violation would that be btw?






Member since:
2005-09-30
Illegal why?
Illegal in the sense you are restricted to use in a given machine? Where's that contract one signs saying it? Right, there's none...