Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 6th Aug 2007 18:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 261380
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So I'll shuffle it down your throat
2. replace *box with WMI
3. notice how frustrating this gnome + WMI setup is
4. get rid of gnome and take off
2. replace *box with WMI
3. notice how frustrating this gnome + WMI setup is
4. get rid of gnome and take off
Or, alternatively, just do this:
2. notice how frustrating this gnome + metacity setup is
3. replace metacity with openbox + fbpanel
4. get rid of gnome and take off
This is not for everybody but that lightweightness and nextgenerationnes arguments are as irritating as denis enlargement ads
Well, OK. As you say, it isn't for everybody.
But if some people are indeed looking for a lightweight desktop to bring some new life back to older hardware, that is still capable of running current gtk applications at useable speed, then those people do need to understand how to go about it.
Replace Gnome. Or replace KDE. replace the "heavy" bit that is holding the system down. That is the trick.
As you point out, there are several viable way to do that replacement. It isn't really an argument ... pick something that suits your purpose and fits the bill ... or don't. You could just go & buy new kit if you have the money and you don't feel inclined to experiment here. The point is ... there are some people who do want to do something functional and lightweight with old hardware. If you don't want to do that then fine, don't, and don't waste your time reading a thread like this and getting yourself all irritated about it.




Member since:
2007-02-17
Exactly my experience with all the *boxes: no benefit, didn't feel any lightness etc. If you wanna fly use WMI or DWM.
It is not the Openbox WM (or even GNOME's WM metacity) that is the problem, it is the GNOME desktop itself.
If you want to fly (even on old hardware), then [ (Openbox or metacity or sawfish or xfwm4) + (fbpanel or lxpanel) + (rox filer or pcmanfm) ] is a perfectly acceptable approach to a lightweight desktop.
Once again, it was not Openbox that caused the lack of benefit that deb2006 reported, it was the "tried it with Gnome" bit that caused the lack of benefit. deb2006 did not replace the resource-hog software (Gnome desktop) that was causing the sluggishness.
Replacing Gnome's metacity WM with Openbox WM, or even for that matter with WMI or DWM indeed won't have any benefit.
Edited 2007-08-07 10:54