Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 10th Aug 2007 20:52 UTC, submitted by irbis
Thread beginning with comment 262827
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-01-06
Essentially, VMWare's rep is hand-waving exactly what these "mini-OSes" would comprise and look like -- and then what the implications would be. Don't get me wrong: I'm not opposed to looking at a potential alternative to today's operating systems; however, it's my opinion that we would end up replacing today's OS complexity with a future blend of app complexity. So, what exactly have we gained, other than pushing what was previously operating system functionality higher in the stack -- up to the application space? App writers have more than enough on their plates without worrying about without having to duplicate or supplement OS functionality. Not to mention, will app writers have the expertise to even accomplish it? I'm not so sure that they would be willing to sign on to do this work. What's their incentive? To elimiinate today's operating system? Why would they do that? They get plenty of value out of Linux and Windows and Solaris and AIX. This seems like yet another "solution" looking for a problem to solve.