Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 12th Aug 2007 20:23 UTC
A few years ago, I was an avid QNX user. I used the non-commercial desktop version of this wonderfully clean and elegant pure-microkernel operating system for a long period of time, as a desktop operating system. I liked the whole style of this operating system, its Photon user interface, and its excellent package management system. I even wrote a three-page article about it. Sadly, QSS, the company behind QNX, lost all interest in the non-commercial desktop version, and ditched it, leaving only a hard-to-find 30-day evaluation version alive. Community interest dwindled, and so did mine. Despite my lost interest, it saddened me today to learn that QNXZone.com, a community portal for QNX, has been shut down. Read on for a few short thoughts.
Thread beginning with comment 262857
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-06-29
Member since:2005-07-24
"""
QNX is doing extremely well in its intended space
"""
Granted. Microkernels can do well in niche areas.
It seems that whenever a general purpose OS developer tries to go microkernel, they end up backpedaling and end up with a retrofitted monolithic design.
Except for Minix which, despite what Tanenbaum claims during his combination dog and pony show / microkernel pep rallies, performs abysmally.
And, of course, for The HURD. That shining example of the power of the microkernel design concept.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-11-30
Nothing new here. uKernels are meant to die.