Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 12th Aug 2007 15:52 UTC, submitted by zaboing
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless "A few months ago, the GNOME Mobile Platform was announced to the public. One of the main forces behind the launch of this initiative was Nokia, which uses a lot of GNOME-components in its Linux-based Internet Tablets Nokia 770 and N800. During this years GUADEC Andreas Proschofsky had the chance to sit down with Carlos Guerreiro, Nokias Manager for Open Source Software, to talk - amidst other things - about the not so different needs of personal computers and mobile devices, about the necessity for GTK+ 3.0 and the impact of the iPhone launch."
Thread beginning with comment 262902
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Qt
by leos on Mon 13th Aug 2007 00:49 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Qt"
leos
Member since:
2005-09-21

A paid-for toolkit is OK. It's just that the price might be too high for many shops. If even Adobe, VMWare and Nero chose GTK+, not Qt for their Linux software, what can be said about smaller shops?


On the other hand, Opera, Google (Earth), Skype, and VirtualBox chose Qt.. I don't think there is overwhelming evidence that commercial developers prefer one or the other.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 6

RE[5]: Qt
by baadger on Mon 13th Aug 2007 01:07 in reply to "RE[4]: Qt"
baadger Member since:
2006-08-29

Actually Google Earth for Linux uses it's own bundled version of Wine. So no 'native' toolkit at all.

Opera use QT but *seem* to have written their own GU abstraction toolkit (or atleast skinning engine) for in webpage form elements since these, as is the rest of Opera, are skinnable. Opera's dialog's, when skinned, do not match the main menu style (which looks 'native' QT).

All in all, the situation regarding GUI toolkits on Free Desktop's is a community dividing one. People (in my experience) don't tend to use QT apps under Gnome or GTK+ apps under KDE. It just feels wrong somehow, and both toolkits and their respective DE's have their own philosophies.

Btw, those wanting homogenous GTK+ and QT themes might want to look at "QtCurve".

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[6]: Qt
by leos on Mon 13th Aug 2007 02:40 in reply to "RE[5]: Qt"
leos Member since:
2005-09-21

Actually Google Earth for Linux uses it's own bundled version of Wine. So no 'native' toolkit at all.


Google Earth uses Qt 3. A quick google search will reveal that. Or just check at the libs it loads
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=188273&cid=15519884

You may be thinking of Picasa, which uses Wine to run on Linux
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/26/0310229

Opera use QT but *seem* to have written their own GU abstraction toolkit


Yup, last I heard most of their UI is their own toolkit. Some things like menus and printing support uses Qt.

All in all, the situation regarding GUI toolkits on Free Desktop's is a community dividing one. People (in my experience) don't tend to use QT apps under Gnome or GTK+ apps under KDE. It just feels wrong somehow, and both toolkits and their respective DE's have their own philosophies.


More or less. I try to stay away from GTK apps on my KDE desktop, just because I don't know any of them that don't have a Qt based counterpart, and running just one toolkit saves resources. Would be nice of course if that situation didn't exist, but there isn't anything that can be done about the situation.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 7