Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 1st Sep 2005 14:47 UTC
Microsoft Some prominent figures in the Linux community believe that as enterprises increase their use of Linux on the desktop, Microsoft will be forced to consider offering a version of Office for Linux. "When the [Linux desktop] market share gets to a certain point, Microsoft will, just as it did with Apple in the past, make Office available on Linux," CEO Stuart Cohen of OSDL said in an interview. My take: Mr. Cohen is forgetting two important things: Excel was first released for the Mac (1985) and Word wasn't popular until MS ported it from DOS to Mac (1985).
Thread beginning with comment 26326
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Doesn't make sense
by on Thu 1st Sep 2005 15:22 UTC

Member since:

OpenOffice is already there, why would people switch to Office? I don't see any gains...

RE: Doesn't make sense
by cujo on Thu 1st Sep 2005 15:25 in reply to "Doesn't make sense"
cujo Member since:
2005-07-06

The answer to this is painfully obvious to anyone that has a job which relies on more than just simple spreadsheets and word doc.

Like it or not, the MS Office suite is vital to more offices than any OSS fan wants to admit. Not only are the tools matue, but the people who use them know how to use them to do very complex things. OpenOffice will never be appealing to these people on the simple fact that it is different.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE[2]: Doesn't make sense
by on Thu 1st Sep 2005 15:28 in reply to "RE: Doesn't make sense"
Member since:

Agreed. Open Office tends to be a bit buggy too. I tried using it back in college to create a spreadsheet and for some reason it wouldn't let me change certain fields; I had to retype the entire thing. Not exactly what I would called "productive" office suite. MS Office is solid, safe, effective office software. Open Office can never replace it in the work place.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: Doesn't make sense
by on Thu 1st Sep 2005 15:33 in reply to "RE: Doesn't make sense"
Member since:

I can't really comment on MSoffice or OOo being able to do the most complex tasks, but as for people being used to Office, well that's just something corporations will have to add to the equation: educating people on OOo and "Linux" (more likely a DE like KDE or Gnome).
As for MS selling Office for Linux: I don't see it happening. There's little gain in it for MS (they would just make it easier running something else than Windows and probably not make a lot of money either)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 0

RE[3]: Doesn't make sense
by eosp on Thu 1st Sep 2005 19:20 in reply to "RE: Doesn't make sense"
eosp Member since:
2005-07-07

Notice they're still reluctant to admit that it is a competent desktop OS. I seem to remember an article (either here or on /.) where a guy put Ubuntu on his n00b wife's PC, and she didn't even notice the difference from win.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE: Doesn't make sense
by Rude Turnip on Thu 1st Sep 2005 15:38 in reply to "Doesn't make sense"
Rude Turnip Member since:
2005-07-14

I've got an $800 Excel *add-on* that only works with Excel 2000 and later. It would be nice to still be able to use that investment ;)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1