Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 13th Aug 2007 16:17 UTC, submitted by dylansmrjones
SCO, Caldera, Unixware SCO has published a statement after the court ruling in their case against Novell: "The company is obviously disappointed with the ruling issued last Friday. However, the court clearly determined that SCO owns the copyrights to the technology developed or derived by SCO after Novell transferred the assets to SCO in 1995." And at the end: "Although the district judge ruled in Novell's favor on important issues, the case has not yet been fully vetted by the legal system and we will continue to explore our options with respect to how we move forward from here."
Thread beginning with comment 263383
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Hey..One Man's Trash...
by Larz on Tue 14th Aug 2007 16:36 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Hey..One Man's Trash..."
Larz
Member since:
2006-01-04

Since when did stockholders become liable for a companys debt? If you take it private, you might be liable though. But who on earth would do that?

Another thing is, that SCO might not be worth much (or anything), if the counterclaims goes against SCO. But yes - of course Microsoft would have the money to pay SCOs liabilities. Whats a few billions among friends....

Reply Parent Score: 1