Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 14th Aug 2007 17:45 UTC, submitted by WillM
Thread beginning with comment 263408
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: ugh bloat, embedded systems.
by Hiev on Tue 14th Aug 2007 18:50
in reply to "ugh bloat, embedded systems."
RE: ugh bloat, embedded systems.
by hyriand on Tue 14th Aug 2007 20:15
in reply to "ugh bloat, embedded systems."
RE: ugh bloat, embedded systems.
by jessta on Tue 14th Aug 2007 23:20
in reply to "ugh bloat, embedded systems."
Running a mono runtime virtual machine to be able to run silverlight stuff.
This will defintely put a hurt on an embedded system's ability to run silverlight.
This will defintely put a hurt on an embedded system's ability to run silverlight.
as apposed to an embedded system's ability to run a hack web application(html,css,javascript) in a web browser?
RE[2]: ugh bloat, embedded systems.
by Lobotomik on Wed 15th Aug 2007 10:48
in reply to "RE: ugh bloat, embedded systems."
RE: ugh bloat, embedded systems.
by Lobotomik on Wed 15th Aug 2007 10:43
in reply to "ugh bloat, embedded systems."
Unlike what? Flash and Java also need their own VM. And Silverlight is a subset of .NET, so it will be less memory greedy. And Moonlight is largely written in c++, so performance should be quite good even in low-power systems.
Now, being in bed with Microsoft gives a very uneasy feeling... But in this arena, they seem to be a much better bed partner than Adobe.





Member since:
2006-01-06
Running a mono runtime virtual machine to be able to run silverlight stuff.
This will defintely put a hurt on an embedded system's ability to run silverlight.