To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Blake Stowell, a former PR flak and one-time head of SCOsource, told Mozillazine that ALL OS vendors were potentially subject to litigation because all OSes included SCOX IP. He specifically mentioned MS, Apple and the BSDs. Judge Kimball has posted a detailed ruling that places that claim irretrievably in the bit bucket.
Why Sun and HP were declared "clean" without ever doing a code review and Linux was declared to be a target even though their own code reviews (plural) had found NOTHING is a key to understanding that the suits they initiated were merely a way of keeping the company from going under since they had never made a profit and had only 6 months working capital left at the time they lauched this abomination of a "legal" proceeding.
I could of course be wrong but...
Leopard is based on the BSD kernel which was forked off before System V. My understanding of this whole discussion is that it revolves aroudn the right to the System V based code, so based on that I figure that Apple should be quite safe.
I'm not actually sure that Johann Chua's comment is relevant though as the issue is not whether or not the O/S Is using the Unix trademark but rather whether or not it is based around System V code.




Member since:
2005-07-06
Apple's OS X Leopard recently got Unix certification, so could Apple also be sued?