To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I understand that it is your personal opinion and I respect that, but since when does a phone require wifi to be considered a "true" smartphone? My Treo 650 has no wifi and yet I can go online anywhere I get a cellphone signal (which is anywhere I carry the phone) at near-DSL speeds. I don't have to wait until I'm near a hotspot, and while I do pay for that, it's cheap -- US$19.95/month -- and it's unlimited bandwidth.
I do feel that wifi would be a nice addition for the added speed boost at hotspots, but to me it's not worth buying a new phone and it certainly doesn't disqualify mine as a smartphone. Just the fact that I can run any number of palmOS apps qualifies it.
For that matter, I would say the Treos and Windows Mobile PDA/phones out there are more worthy of the title than any RAZR or even the iPhone -- at least until we get third-party app support for those.
Edited 2007-08-17 10:32
I fancy the zaurus pda´s and allways have. Sometimes it´s nice to have anonymous access. And any hotspot in theory can provide just that. Anyway wifi is handy if you want to sync anywhere in the office and at home. I personally don't like bluetooth. You see the mileage may vary. The prize of the phone would held me back from buying though.




Member since:
2005-07-06
I don't want to be picky but if the phone tends to be a smartphone i would expect it to have wifi. I quite like the slick design though.
Edited 2007-08-17 07:44