Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 21st Aug 2007 18:19 UTC, submitted by SEJeff
Privacy, Security, Encryption Jeff Jones has published another one of his vulnerability scorecards comparing various operating system offerings. As always, these figures just list the patched vulnerabilities over the designated period of time; they do not take into account any unfixed or undisclosed vulnerabilities. Hence, these reports are not proper measurements of security - they are just that, a tally of fixed vulnerabilities. Any conclusions like "x is more secure than y" cannot be drawn from this data set. As always, do with it as you please.
Thread beginning with comment 264834
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Let the
by CrazyDude0 on Tue 21st Aug 2007 19:13 UTC
CrazyDude0
Member since:
2005-07-10

fanboys begin justifying high number of vulnerabilities in RHEL and SUSE....

RE: Let the
by yanik on Tue 21st Aug 2007 19:30 in reply to "Let the"
yanik Member since:
2005-07-13

I'll start,

It's the number of vulnerabilities that were fixed. Who knows how much undisclosed vulnerabilities are still not fixed by Microsoft...

lol ;)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 8

RE[2]: Let the
by diegocg on Tue 21st Aug 2007 20:55 in reply to "RE: Let the"
diegocg Member since:
2005-07-08

Bullshit. Better software has a lower number of security holes.

According to your theory, OpenBSD or qmail are absolute CRAP, because they don't release many security fixes.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4