Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 21st Aug 2007 18:19 UTC, submitted by SEJeff
Privacy, Security, Encryption Jeff Jones has published another one of his vulnerability scorecards comparing various operating system offerings. As always, these figures just list the patched vulnerabilities over the designated period of time; they do not take into account any unfixed or undisclosed vulnerabilities. Hence, these reports are not proper measurements of security - they are just that, a tally of fixed vulnerabilities. Any conclusions like "x is more secure than y" cannot be drawn from this data set. As always, do with it as you please.
Thread beginning with comment 264835
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Looks like fun
by CrazyDude0 on Tue 21st Aug 2007 19:14 UTC in reply to "Looks like fun"
CrazyDude0
Member since:
2005-07-10

Nice attack merkoth:) Is telling lies on osnews that fun?

His numbers are not random, they are taken from vendor's websites.

Edited 2007-08-21 19:15

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: Looks like fun
by flashog on Tue 21st Aug 2007 19:28 in reply to "RE: Looks like fun"
flashog Member since:
2007-07-25

...but they might as well be.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 9

RE[2]: Looks like fun
by merkoth on Tue 21st Aug 2007 19:33 in reply to "RE: Looks like fun"
merkoth Member since:
2006-09-22

Nice attack merkoth:) Is telling lies on osnews that fun?

His numbers are not random, they are taken from vendor's websites.


I don't know, you tell me. I said random numbers not because he made up the numbers, but because he keeps picking up numbers without any serious security notion to back them up. Counting fixed issues proves nothing in favor or against anyone and, IMHO of course, these numbers and charts are only for those who can't really understand what they represent.

Try to ellaborate some more your flames before calling anyone a liar.

Edited 2007-08-21 19:36 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 13

RE[2]: Looks like fun
by flanque on Tue 21st Aug 2007 21:35 in reply to "RE: Looks like fun"
flanque Member since:
2005-12-15

I think 'random' is a bad choice of a word, but I agree with his point which I think is that it's rather pointless and a very poor measure. It would seem to me that these 'reports' are more about headlines than providing any real investigative work and statistical analysis.

His 'attack' is quite justified in my view.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5