Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Aug 2007 21:07 UTC, submitted by Kishe
Thread beginning with comment 264974
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2006-06-26
>>Although going by the "rules" he has done nothing wrong the comment displays a distinct lack of technical knowledge and a slight degree of GPL zealotry. Not to mention that this story is about Netbeans and not OpenSolaris.
The above is rude and a bunch of crap and so I ignore it.
>> OpenSolaris could not simply *use* Linux drivers as they are fundamentally different, i'm sure there is
That's not what I said. You have to read more carefully, man. And it should be possible to read _one_ sentence carefully, don't you think
>> some good info that could be gleaned from the Linux drivers but I doubt it would be worth going GPL and losing the benfits inherent in CDDL?
That's what SUN is discussing internally for months now. For crying out loud, please try to stick to the facts!
>> The CDDL is a great open source license that serves the needs and wants of the OpenSolaris community just fine, the community may decide to go GPL3 based upon it's merits but going to GPL2 would be a step backward in many eyes, including mine.
That's SUN marketing, doesn't belong here. Apparently Jonathan Schwartz does not quite agree with you, as he (and others at SUN) have been discussing the GPL 3 for months now.
>> A constructive approach often benefits all, rolling around on the floor screaming "I want GPL" is not going to help anyone.
I think SUN is very constructive. Don't underestimate SUN. They have used the GPL 2 for Java, and it's quite possible that they are using GPL 3 for OpenSolaris.
Edited 2007-08-22 07:54