Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 22nd Aug 2007 22:10 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 265117
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
From what I've seen, it seems KDE vs Gnome in terms of speed depends a bit on what you think is important. KDE apps draw faster (Qt is more efficient than GTK), but Gnome apps start faster due to GCC and the other parts of the stack below the DE being better with C than C++. Wen run from within KDE, KDE apps start almost as fast as Gnome ones, but run from Gnome, KDE apps start very slow. Time will fix this, as things like the dynamic linker get better at C++ code.




Member since:
2007-01-18
Ubuntu was the first distro that I got serious about. The main reason was because it installed from just one CD or because it was just easier for me to learn, but that's neither here nor there. I can tell you that I was a huge fan of gnome and virtually a hater of KDE. I still like the layout of gnome, but I have since switched to KDE for the most part.
The main reason I switched to KDE was because it just seemed faster to me. More responsive. Maybe that's a fallacy, but that's the way it seemed to me. I've since stuck with KDE because I have grown to like the way it works.