Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 22nd Aug 2007 17:52 UTC, submitted by Dan Warne
Thread beginning with comment 265142
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2006-03-31
"Not only that, but saying that software has freedoms just like people demeans the whole idea of what freedom is."
Thank you for your historical notes. I very much appreciate them. However I disagree with your assumption that free software is trivial compared to other issues facing the world. Initially I agreed with you, but here is a counter-example:
A friend has been working on a program that does protein interaction and gene expression analysis to determine the characteristics of breast cancer. This program requires computational statistics. Matlab provided the required routines to do the calculations, but the program needs to be able to run on computers without Matlab installed. The friend looked at the source code of R, figured out how the calculations were done, and included them in her program.
In this case, free AND open source software benefited science; perhaps in the future it might improve the lives of others. That's a clear-cut example.
EDIT: I improved the explanation of the example.
Edited 2007-08-23 03:43