Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Aug 2007 13:24 UTC, submitted by irbis
Thread beginning with comment 265760
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.






Member since:
2005-12-09
Unless, of course, people KNEW they were going to shut the place down completely for a year. Or, even worse, people noticed at the six-week mark that nothing was happening at Redmondco Inc. No support, no patches, no nothing, I'm not sure it would bode well. Plus,they'd have to stop paying all the employees for that time to keep ALL the money, the shareholders would have to be asked nicely not to divest to severely, and if they turned around and invested whatever money was left over they'd suddenly be an investment company, and that's hardly "shutting down". Microsoft, like anyone else, needs momentum to stay dominant. In the computer industry, a year's lassitude would cost ANYBODY dearly, even Microsoft, if only in perception of future health.