Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Aug 2007 15:38 UTC, submitted by shykid
Thread beginning with comment 266058
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: It's sad how far Gateway has fallen
by -pekr- on Mon 27th Aug 2007 18:30
in reply to "It's sad how far Gateway has fallen"
RE[2]: It's sad how far Gateway has fallen
by erebos on Mon 27th Aug 2007 21:17
in reply to "RE: It's sad how far Gateway has fallen"
RE: It's sad how far Gateway has fallen
by vimh on Mon 27th Aug 2007 18:42
in reply to "It's sad how far Gateway has fallen"
It was Infogrames. They bought Hasbro (who owned Atari) and then renamed their US subsidiary Atari. I don't know if the brand name really did much for them. I played a number of games they published (Hasbro owned the IP).
I don't know about most gamers but I pay more attention to the developers (both studio and individuals) than I do publisher.
With computers it's kinda similar. I look at the hardware a company puts into their computer. Who's video card, what chipset & MB, who's RAM and so on. The big name on the computer box has less of an impact.







Member since:
2006-07-04
Only 710 million? I didn't realize Gateway had fallen so far from their height of the mid to late 1990's.
I wonder if Acer will change its name to Gateway. A few year ago the video game maker Engram (I believe that was their name) bought "Atari" (whatever was left of it) from Hasbro, and then changed their name to "Atari". So the stronger company bought a weak one and changed its name to that of the weak one because that name was better known.