Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Aug 2007 22:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 266326
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Ok, in no way whatsoever was I bashing Linux, I promise.
My point was that if boot time was in any way an acceptable metric for performance, anything using the standard INIT would give the impression that Linux was less performant then windows, even though the opposite is true. When an ubuntu user chimes in that his boots in about 40 seconds, all I was saying is that ubuntu is an exception, as they redid their init a few versions ago.
This should be obvious to anyone reading the post. However, this is the fourth reply by downright pedantic linux users who feel that I misrepresented their beloved operating system, even though the exact opposite is happening.




Member since:
2006-02-05
Ubuntu redid their INIT process to make it more XP like, so it is a bad example. I was referring to the older init, where services loaded sequentially rather then concurrently.