Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Aug 2007 12:12 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 266504
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Never attribute to malice that which is readily explained by stupidity. In this particular case, the driver had BSD bits and GPL bits in the source and someone removed one of the notices by accident (presumably not realizing where the BSD-only chuck started and ended).
Seeing as how the issue was fixed within a few minutes of it being pointed out, I don't think it's a big deal.
http://kerneltrap.org/node/14243
Maybe this clarifies it. There is no "it seems" in copyright law.






Member since:
2005-12-13
...why should one do so when the act itself (the hijacking of the rights to the code in question) never should have happened and since the news value of this is legitimate enough for them to discuss openly in a forum?