Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Aug 2007 00:28 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Windows Robert Love, a famous Linux kernel hacker, has written a blog entry with his thoughs on the recently posted Vista's network slowdown issue and the explanation given by Mark Russinovich: "Unlike DPCs, however, the Linux parallel does not consume nearly half of your CPU. There is no excusable reason why processing IP packets should so damagingly affect the system. Thus, this absolutely abysmal networking performance should be an issue in and of itself, but the Windows developers decided to focus on a secondary effect."
Thread beginning with comment 266674
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Latency and network.
by n4cer on Wed 29th Aug 2007 19:06 UTC in reply to "Latency and network."
Member since:

You're assuming that those results are still relevant. Windows' architecture has changed signifigantly in 9 years, as have NICs and NIC drivers (and the care taken in writing them). More processing is done in software on the low-end because it's more cost effective, not unlike with most modems today vs. their more expensive hardware counterparts. Greater driver dependance leads to greater variances between driver versions. The driver could easily harm performance with long DPC latencies, wheras a different driver improves performance by shortening such latences. Likewise, the driver's configuration can also impact performance.

Edited 2007-08-29 19:10

Reply Parent Score: 4