Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Aug 2007 21:57 UTC, submitted by Kroc
Microsoft The AutoPatcher project has been asked by Microsoft to stop operations. "Today we received an e-mail from Microsoft, requesting the immediate take-down of the download page, which of course means that AutoPatcher is probably history. As much as we disagree, we can do very little, and although the download page is merely a collection of mirrors, we took the download page down. We would like to thank you for your support. For the past 4 years, it has been a blast. Unfortunately, it seems like it's the end of AutoPatcher as we know it."
Thread beginning with comment 266721
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE
by Kroc on Wed 29th Aug 2007 22:08 UTC
Kroc
Member since:
2005-11-10

I fix machines for a living now, I know just how much consumers suffer with Windows and they need all the help they can get. Autopatcher has helped my customers stay safe for years, and I'm frankly disgusted by Microsoft's complete contempt for its users. How much more do users have to suffer?

RE
by Adurbe on Wed 29th Aug 2007 22:14 in reply to "RE"
Adurbe Member since:
2005-07-06

although doubtless helpful to MANY (myself included)

it did mean I didnt manually click 'agree' which means if I broke something within that text then I would have deniability, microsoft cannot accept that

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE
by Kroc on Wed 29th Aug 2007 22:16 in reply to "RE"
Kroc Member since:
2005-11-10

Microsoft's EULA is presented when you run AutoPatcher. AutoPatcher is nothing more than a time saving device that spares you from downloading the patches and installing them one by one yourself. You still agree to the EULA the same.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE
by robertojdohnert on Thu 30th Aug 2007 07:08 in reply to "RE"
robertojdohnert Member since:
2005-07-12

WGA will never play a part in the security update side because everyone and anyone can download security updates. If you have a legal version of Windows why does it matter anyhow? I dont see this as contempt, its Microsoft protecting its brand because if someone does litter the updates with viruses and malware, who is going to field the calls? Microsoft. Not you, not me. IMO people are blowing this way out of left field.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE
by morglum666 on Thu 30th Aug 2007 13:18 in reply to "RE"
morglum666 Member since:
2005-07-06

I've never understood why anyone would want to use a third party outside of the vendor for patches. What kind of protection does that offer you?

Even worse, setting it up for a business.. imagine if they found a trojan or the file had been modified, and then they learn that you *skipped* the official update process because you thought it was a better idea?

Windows update has a few quirks but its a well run service. They even turn it on for you when the operating system is installed, so its no hassle at all.

Morglum

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE
by shapeshifter on Thu 30th Aug 2007 14:39 in reply to "RE"
shapeshifter Member since:
2006-09-19

Windows update has a few quirks but its a well run service. They even turn it on for you when the operating system is installed, so its no hassle at all.


Welcome to our planet Earth, hope you'll enjoy your stay.
Any software that downloads files to my computer without my permission is SPYWARE, TROJAN, VIRUS.
And that's what Windows Update is, one gigant SPYWARE,TROJAN, and VIRUS, all-in-one.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1