Linked by Kroc on Thu 30th Aug 2007 13:03 UTC
Editorial I hear often that when something new appears that "competition is good". The primary reasons competition is seen as good, are: it drives down prices; it gives consumers more choice; it pushes technology forward, quicker. Competition is not good because: competition is why consumers have to choose between HD-DVD and BluRay; competition is why DRM exists; and more. In this article, each of the supposed benefits of competition will be looked at in more detail.
Thread beginning with comment 267005
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Kroc
Member since:
2005-11-10

DRM is an anti-competitive measure created by the presence of competition. If companies worked together with no intention of trying to screw the other over, then DRM would not so much as pass anybody's mind.

I wasn't saying one thing; then another. The first line was simply paraphrasing what other's say that competition does, and then me providing alternative views on those items.

Reply Parent Score: 2

JonathanBThompson Member since:
2006-05-26

DRM is only to prevent competition between unpurchased (ie pirated) copies and purchased copies: it doesn't itself do a darn thing for competition between other producers, but only (at least in theory) protects the producers of something that uses DRM from being screwed by pirated copies of their works.

Where you came up with the concept that DRM was brought about by competition appears to be a red herring at best.

Reply Parent Score: 3