To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Capitalism is based on the idea that competition in a free market will produce the best results. Marxism is based on the idea that everyone working together for the good of all is the best way to do things.
The early collaberation was in an academic context, and academia functions in a way alot closer to what marx was talking about the way marx was talking about. This works as long as it is a closed system of intellectuals funded by the larger capitalist system. It doesnt work as a general way of doing business, as can be seen many times in history.
I don't care a jot about literary terms for these things, they only serve to set up A vs. B scenarios. This is reality, and consumers are being screwed over by companies more and more. If I lend my neighbour a cup of sugar, that makes me a full card carrying Marxist, because I'm helping others out?
It seems to me that in this thread, the hardline is that "Society dictates that I must screw over every other guy in the world to be the best, and that's 'good' for everybody". I'm not talking about governments and stuff - I'm just talking about nerds doing the best for technology.
I suppose my naïveté shows, some people seem to launch into an attack whenever they smell the whiff of this so-called "marxism".
I think I'm going to go take a break by punching everybody I meet in the street 




Member since:
2005-11-10
There isn't any politics involved. Since when did simply working together on technology instead of trying to out ego the other guy become Marxist? People were collaborating a lot during the early days of computing; where'd all that go now?
I think it's stupid to think this article has anything to do with politics.