Linked by Kroc on Thu 30th Aug 2007 13:03 UTC
Editorial I hear often that when something new appears that "competition is good". The primary reasons competition is seen as good, are: it drives down prices; it gives consumers more choice; it pushes technology forward, quicker. Competition is not good because: competition is why consumers have to choose between HD-DVD and BluRay; competition is why DRM exists; and more. In this article, each of the supposed benefits of competition will be looked at in more detail.
Thread beginning with comment 267022
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
What a crock!
by moronikos on Thu 30th Aug 2007 15:15 UTC
moronikos
Member since:
2005-07-06

I think the author is a shill for the communist party. Does anybody seriously think that the competition between Intel and AMD has not been good for consumers?

There really aren't any facts or figures from any studies in his opinion piece. Are we supposed to take it on faith that reliability has gone down?

I can't believe this made it as an article for OSNews.com.

Reply Score: 2

RE: What a crock!
by Kroc on Thu 30th Aug 2007 15:19 in reply to "What a crock!"
Kroc Member since:
2005-11-10

"Does anybody seriously think that the competition between Intel and AMD has not been good for consumers?"

The European Union thinks so. *cough*

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE: What a crock!
by alexandru_lz on Thu 30th Aug 2007 15:28 in reply to "What a crock!"
alexandru_lz Member since:
2007-02-11

I think the author is a shill for the communist party. Does anybody seriously think that the competition between Intel and AMD has not been good for consumers?

I do. The competition between Intel and AMD is one of the things that has kept the x86 architecture around several years past the point when it should have been dumped. Tight competition also means fewer risks that a competitor wants to take.

There are many facets in competition. I'm not claiming all of them are good, but surely this article is examining them all.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: What a crock!
by sbergman27 on Thu 30th Aug 2007 15:50 in reply to "RE: What a crock!"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

"""
I do. The competition between Intel and AMD is one of the things that has kept the x86 architecture around several years past the point when it should have been dumped.
"""

You are perfectly free to buy an Itanium, a Sparc, or a PPC. Anyone is.

Intel tried to push Itanium. The industry, and the public chose X86_64.

X86_64 solves the two biggest problems with x86_32 very cleanly. It removes the addressing constraints. And it eliminates the register-constrained nature that has been the bane of x86 for decades.

There are babies. And there is bath water. And it is best not to confuse the two, since people tend to have rather strong feelings as to their relative values.

Opinions differ, of course. I'd take the bath water any day. ;-)

Edited 2007-08-30 15:51

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE: What a crock!
by redtux on Thu 30th Aug 2007 15:42 in reply to "What a crock!"
redtux Member since:
2006-12-04

american by any choice?

Reply Parent Score: 1