To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
> Before KDE 4 surpasses, say Mac OS X
i find this comment quite interesting. what does it -mean- exactly to "surpass Mac OS X"? i hear such cloaked comparisons but am not sure i actually understand what it means to people. i could make a guess, but i'm more interested in what you actually think.
> Incremental evolution, certainly.
ah, you see, you missed the point of my blog then. let me try fewer words:
revolution is what you think you've seen when you've missed out on all the evolutionary steps that have occurred previously. now, not all evolutionary trends result in revolutions, but all revolutions are, actually, evolutionary.
so the trick becomes this: if you can see the various evolutionary processes, can you tell the difference between the ones that will result in revolutionary ends and the ones that won't?
for most people the answer is "no", mostly due to a lack of deep understanding of what they are seeing. (i wouldn't be able to see most revolutions occurring either; my expertise, such as it is, is also limited to a finite number of domains)
this is why most entities try and do as much quietly and then reveal the end results only in an attempt to make the revolutionare aspects more easily apparent. often, it is also used as a way to try and make the completely mundane *appear* revolutionary simply through the apparent gaps in the storyline.
and to bring it all back on topic, what i'm attempting to convey (almost certainly in futility given the complexity of the concept) is that saying something isn't working towards a revolutionary end just because you can also see the evolutionary process of its creation during its creation (which pretty much sums up the "is kde4 revolutionary?" meme) is a false conclusion.
> yes, marketing speech.
more vague words. if all public speaking is marketing, in that it is intended to support the topical item, then .. ok ... that's pretty broad. if by "marketing speech" you mean "empty, vapid, without real meaning" then i'd like to inform you that, at least for me, that's not what it is.
i'm actually sharing my actual thought on actual matters. if it is convincing, bully. if it isn't, i'm still going to share. it's up to you to read or not, reply or not. but don't dismiss things out of hand.
i mean, how would you feel if i characterized your comment as being the naivety typical of users? it's probably unfair and inaccurate, even if it would be quite a tidy way to dismiss you from my perspective.
IMHO there are two areas about that comment:
Objective and subjective.
The objective area is the one where KDE actually lacks features.
The subjective area is the one where KDE has that features, but lacks marketing.
While not every aspect of OS X is great, the overall package is pretty awesome.
Compare Kopete to iChat for example. Yeah, Kopete supports more protocols, but that's about it. iChat is easy and fun. iChat sends h.264/AVC-encoded video chat streams over Jabber for ages and does crazy things with it. Both are open standards with free implementations. You can't tell me that for a somewhat skilled developer it's that hard to add.
http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/ichat/
http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/features/ichat.html
Another things that's missing is iLife. It's technically not a part of Mac OS X, but every Mac ships with it, so the general reception is that iLife is part of OS X. Maybe I missed something, but I can't remember seeing something like iMovie for KDE.
I hadn't the chance to try Freecycle yet, but it looks like a promising GarageBand alternative.
KDE is also missing some sort of creative suite. I know about Krita, Karbon, and Scribus. Marketing Krita and Karbon as a part of KOffice is a bit hard. And I'm not talking about developing a separate creative suite or splitting Krita and Karbon from KOffice source code. Just do separate marketing and include Scribus is that virtual package.
> invested so much time into the project,
yes, i suppose it does require you to make a value judgement about my person. how fun to do that in public! =)
there is also another aspect to throw into the mix: perhaps the person got involved and so invested because of the things they are now speaking about. that doesn't help you in your answer, but it does add a bit more of the complexity that is really there imho.
> seems to have been awfully defensive
fortunately it's not my only dimension.
to not defend one's ideas, thoughts and actions has become part of the popular culture, which is to say that standing up it is often perceived as disruptive, unpopular and controversial. the term used most often, and often innaccurately, is "you're being defensive".
there is true defensiveness, where every action is simply a preventative one. look at my entire body of work and i think you'll see that isn't the case.
but to never stand up is to capitulate to the whims of others, and to never stand up on topics where you have feel conviction and have put your own efforts in is, imho, a character flaw.
the trick is to balance between being a push over sop and a reasonable individual who knows when to be quiet as well and, perhaps most importantly, always be able to listen (even when you yourself are sharing the speaking floor).
feel free to correct me on that one, though. =)





Member since:
2005-07-06
Seigo writes: "Mark my words: KDE4 is a revolution unfolding and you're getting to watch it all happen from the very beginning."
Coming from a person who has invested so much time into the project, either:
(a) You can take their word because they fully understand where things are and where they are going
(b) You can't take their word because they've invested so much time into it that they want to sell it as much as they can. Of course they'll say this and that about it.
I'm not sure which to believe. Aaron seems to have been awfully defensive in the past though.