Linked by Dmitrij D. Czarkoff on Fri 31st Aug 2007 08:54 UTC
Editorial This article is an answer to "Competition Is Not Good" by Kroc and reading it wouldn't be comfortable without switching to and from the original article. I wrote it just because I do strongly disagree with Kroc and I believe I can prove that he is not as close to truth as it may seem from the first glance.
Thread beginning with comment 267286
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It's really simple, though...
by fryke on Fri 31st Aug 2007 09:46 UTC
fryke
Member since:
2005-07-06

You're both right and wrong. (Both are both right and wrong.) You just have different POVs. ;) There are cases where competition helps and cases where it obstructs progress. The main driver of the first article obviously was the HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray fiasko. And it _is_ chaos right now. The consumer _doesn't_ really have a choice here. As long as content providers are splitting up and favour one technology over the other, consumers who _want_ choice have no choice but to buy into _both_ technologies.
The worst thing: How should grandma know whether a "movie" she buys will actually play on her grandchild's equipment? (Assuming she didn't buy him/her that equipment...) She'd have to choose the DVD over any newer tech, because that's the standard that'll actually play on either. Progress?

Reply Score: 2

RE: It's really simple, though...
by ddc_ on Fri 31st Aug 2007 11:32 in reply to "It's really simple, though..."
ddc_ Member since:
2006-12-05

It's not exactly that me and Kroc are both right and wrong. Kroc was wittingly exaggerating, and so was I. That's just the way to give raw black and white data to have reader get the full picture by analyzing it.

Reply Parent Score: 1