Linked by Dmitrij D. Czarkoff on Fri 31st Aug 2007 08:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 267328
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
See the PC processor market history for example.
I'm afraid that the PC processor market is a prime example of what happens when there is competition involved. If it where not for AMD, Intel would have no reason to push they're x86 design forward.
Take the Itanic (Itanium) mess. It's a prime example of a company which thought that the world would follow it's lead no matter what it did. AMD brought out the x86-64bit extensions which proved so popular that Intel had to follow suit.
If Intel where the sold manufacturer of x86 processors, all 64 bit PCs today would be running Itanium.
There is no monopoly in the x86 processor market and there hasn't been in a while.





Member since:
2006-12-05
That's just one school of economics, while other exist. The monopoly is not as bad as it is considered untill there's some unbreakable way to force competitors to shut down. In software there is such a way: copyright. In hardware no such barrier exists, so monopoly is just no bad thing. See the PC processor market history for example.